Mimitangiatua & Haehanga 2022
Benson, M., McKay, A-M., Kanz, W., Shivnan, S., Ruru, I. (2022). Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Mutunga Mauri Compass Assessment of the Mimitangiatua and Haehanga River. Prepared by Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Mutunga. Urenui, Aotearoa New Zealand.
Table of Contents
Report Structure
01
Executive Summary
Overview of findings and key outcomes
02
Introduction
Tupuna Awa - Whakapapa
03
Our Iwi Environmental Management Plan
Kaitiakitanga, values, and objectives
04
The Mimitangiatua & Haehanga Awa
Cultural and historical significance
05
Mauri Compass Assessment
Methodology and results
06
Conclusions & Recommendations
Road map to restoration
Executive Summary
In 2020, Ian Ruru and his sons Riaki and Manawa helped us to apply the Mauri Compass tool and to undertake assessments of the Mimitangatua and Urenui awa, being two of our four tupuna awa (the others being the Onaero and Waitara). The project was sponsored by Te Wai Māori Trust.

Benson, M., McKay, A-M., Ruru, M., Ruru, R., Ruru, I. (2020). Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Mutunga Mauri Compass Assessment of the Urenui River and the Mimitangiatua River. Prepared for Te Wai Māori Trust by Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Mutunga. Urenui, New Zealand.
The Mauri Compass values and recognises the skills and knowledge that Ngāti Mutunga whānau have – ngā taonga tuku iho. We found that the tool used a good balance of mātauranga Māori and science data collection. We embraced the tool as a way to monitor effect of resource consents on the mauri of our awa, and to support our involvement in Resource Management Act processes.
For the purpose of our involvement in the Environment Court hearing on the Remediation New Zealand consent applications (Environment Court Case ENV-2021-AKL-000059) we have used the Mauri Compass tool to evaluate the Haehanga catchment.
Assessment Purpose
We used the original assessment of the Mimitangiatua awa and integrated information relevant to the Haehanga following our Mauri Compass monitoring of the Haehanga.
The presentation of both the Mimitangiatua and Haehanga in this Mauri Compass report is appropriate as the Haehanga is an important tributary of the Mimitangiatua.
The purpose of this report is to:
  • Present the findings of a Mauri Compass assessment of the (i) Mimitangiatua Catchment and the (ii) Haehanga Catchment
  • Express the aspirations of Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Mutunga in our legal challenge to the operation of the Remediation New Zealand site in the Environment Court
The outcomes of the Mauri Compass assessment were based on Ngāti Mutunga mātauranga articulated through hui and wānanga, and anchored with reference material including the Ngāti Mutunga Iwi Environmental Management Plan.
Assessment Methodology
Three of the twelve Mauri Compass indicators focus on the health and well being of our freshwater sentinel taonga, the tuna. We visited four sites on the Mimitangiatua awa (for our 2020 Report) and four sites in the Haehanga stream (in 2022).
2020 Mimitangiatua Findings
In our 2020 Report, we found that species richness, tuna abundance, and tuna health had each fallen 80% for the Mimitangiatua awa. Ngāti Mutunga connections to our tupuna awa, tikanga, mahinga kai practices, and overall wairua of our tupuna awa had decreased similarly.
Water Quality Impact
Poor water quality in the Mimitangiatua, linked to water pollution across the catchment, has resulted in an all-encompassing rāhui within lower parts of the catchment (including harvesting of fish, shellfish, and undertaking swimming and recreation).
Key Findings: Comparative Analysis
Key findings from this updated Mauri Compass assessment are located in Table 3. In these findings we have compared the mauri of the Haehanga with the mauri of the Mimitangiatua. These two waterbodies are integrally linked. While the mauri of both the Mimitanguatia and Haehanga awa has steeply declined since European settlement, the Haehanga awa has fared the worst.
With specific reference to the Haehanga awa and in comparison to pre-European times, all 12 Mauri Compass indicators have been profoundly impacted to the following extent:
Haehanga Awa: Indicator Decline
-100%
Chemhazards
Complete loss of chemical safety
-100%
Taonga Species Health
Total decline in species wellbeing
-100%
Mahinga Kai
Complete loss of food gathering practices
-94%
Taonga Species Abundance
Near-total population decline
Further Indicator Decline
-80%
Taonga Species Richness
Severe loss of species diversity
-80%
Biohazards
Major increase in biological contamination
-80%
Tikanga
Significant loss of cultural practices
-80%
Wairua
Profound spiritual disconnection
Additional Negative Impacts
68%
Habitat
Major habitat degradation and loss
60%
Ngāti Mutunga Connection
Substantial disconnection from ancestral waters
45%
Biodiversity
Significant ecosystem diversity loss
37%
Catchment Health
Considerable watershed degradation
The Mana of the Haehanga
The mana of the Haehanga has been severely trampled on, with that catchment subject to extensive physical alteration and discharge of pollution into surface and ground waters. This is an affront to Ngāti Mutunga.
It is apparent that the chemical pollutants (Chemhazards) eminating from the RNZ site set off a chain reaction impacting on Ngāti Mutunga taonga species, their health and abundance. This in turn prohibits our ability to nurture and practice mahinga kai thereby impacting on our spiritual and cultural obligations as kaitiaki of our tupuna awa.
Cultural Impact & Contamination
The Haehanga currently pollutes well beyond its own catchment, in terms of Ngāti Mutunga cultural concerns. Contaminants from the Remediation NZ site are high risk and culturally offensive, with mana whenua unwilling to practice mahinga kai in both the Haehanga and Mimitangiatua because of both conventional and cultural health concerns. The potential presence of compounds from drilling wastes, abattoir wastes, pathogens, and timber products prevent us from connecting with our tupuna awa.
This scale of transformation and impact on the mauri of the Haehanga awa is particularly abhorrent to Ngāti Mutunga. Ngāti Mutunga attribute the demise to the operation of the RNZ site.
WHIRIA TE TANGATA, WHIRIA TE KAUPAPA, WHIRIA NGĀ TAONGA TUKU IHO
Introduction: Our Ancestral Connection
Ko te Titōhea, ka meangiatia, he puna koropupū, ahakoa tukitukia e te poaka E kore e mimiti, ka koropupū, ka koropupū, ka koropupū
Ngāti Mutunga descends from a number of ancestors who lived in the area occupied today by ngā uri o ngā tūpuna o Ngāti Mutunga. These ancestors include Tokauri, Tokatea, Mihirau, Heruika, Pūrakino, Rakaupounamu, Uenuku (son of Ruawahia), Hineweo, Hinenō, Te Hihiotū, Kahukura, and Mutunga. Ngāti Mutunga also descends from ancestors who arrived on the Tokomaru, Tahatuna and Ōkoki waka such as Taitaawaro, Manaia and Ngānganarūrū. Over generations, the descendants of these tūpuna intermarried and became generally known as Ngāti Mutunga.
Our Traditional Rohe
The traditional rohe of Ngāti Mutunga is indelibly etched into both physical and historical landscapes. The Papatiki stream signals the interface with Ngāti Tama in the North. From here, the stream flows past Titoki pa and then outlines the extremities of tūpuna mana as far north as the Mangahia Stream from which an easterly direction is struck to Huanui, then northeast to Waitara-iti. The rohe then finds a natural eastern definition in the Waitara River as the river flows southward to the Pouiatoa precinct. From here, the border extends further south and then northwest along the Taramoukou stream to a point where the Waitara river connects with the Makara Stream. The confines of manawhenua are then traced in a northerly direction, skirting slightly west of the Poukekewa, Poutotara, and Pukemai streams. The Mangahewa Stream then provides an outline for the duration of the course to the coast. The old settlement in the district of Te Rau o te Huia was bounded by the Waiau River, and its remains mark the area of the Ngāti Mutunga traditional southern boundary. Within these boundaries lie the Mimitangiatua, Urenui and Onaero catchments, with their mainstem and supporting river valleys providing important linkages and resources in all directions across the rohe.
Tupuna Awa - Whakapapa
Our three Tupuna awa, Onaero, Urenui and Mimitangiatua are prominent features of our whenua, culture, and everyday lives. Another name for Mimitangiatua is Te Wai o Mihirau. As mentioned previously, Mihirau is one of our very early and respected ancestors from whom many of our people descend.
The mainstems and supporting river valleys and catchments of our Tupuna awa also provide important linkages and resources in all directions across the rohe. The area of the Ngāti Mutunga rohe described above is approximately 63,200 hectares (156,000 acres).
Prior to the arrival of tauiwi in Aotearoa, the Ngāti Mutunga iwi was an autonomous, independent and self-governing confederation of hapū. These hapū included Te Kekerewai, (also known as Ngāti Rangi, made up of the sub-groupings Ngāti Te Uruwhakawai, Ngāti Korokino, and Ngāti Tutewheuru), Ngāti Hinetuhi, Ngāti Aurutu, Ngāti Okiokingā, Ngāti Kura, Ngāti Uenuku Ngāti Tupawhenua and Kaitangata. Ngāti Mutunga exercised tino rangatiratanga over its traditional rohe. These historical hapū no longer form distinct communities within Ngāti Mutunga. In more recent times, Ngāti Mutunga has interacted as a single tribal grouping that is known today as Ngāti Mutunga.
Our Mission
The mission of Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Mutunga is –
Understanding
Promoting an understanding of Ngāti Mutunga values & responsibilities in our rohe
Protection
Protecting the environment for future generations
Demonstration
Demonstrating Ngāti Mutungatanga through our role as kaitiaki
Figure 1: Mātauranga Māori, intergenerational transfer of knowledge.
Our Iwi Environmental Management Plan
Introduction
Our IEMP is a mandated set of policies that codifies Ngāti Mutunga values to support and educate iwi members working on environmental issues. The IEMP has a legal effect under the RMA and should influence external agencies to work more closely and effectively with Ngāti Mutunga in environmental management within our rohe.
In order to implement this plan and achieve our objectives, Ngāti Mutunga will;
  • Continue to develop our capacity to engage in environmental issues
  • Encourage our rangatahi to take an interest in and pursue studies in relevant environmental fields
  • Look for opportunities to involve our people in environmental monitoring
  • Work with other iwi groups on issues of mutual interest
Three High-Level Outcomes
There are three high-level outcomes that we want to achieve through the implementation of our IEMP:
1
Kaitiakitanga, Tino Rangatiratanga and the Treaty of Waitangi
  • Ngāti Mutunga is effectively involved in the management and protection of natural resources
  • Agencies responsible for environmental management understand and respect the role, value, and responsibilities of Ngāti Mutunga
  • Partnerships between Ngāti Mutunga and agencies responsible for environmental management are developed and enhanced
  • Agencies foster the capacity of Ngāti Mutunga to engage in environmental management, particularly decision-making processes and planning
  • Ngāti Mutunga values become embedded in the planning documents and management practices of relevant agencies
2
Environment
  • Natural and physical resources are managed in a holistic and integrated way
  • The state of the natural environment is restored to a state which supports the values and customs of Ngāti Mutunga
  • The life-supporting capacity of the environment is protected and supported
  • Ngāti Mutunga is actively involved in the day-to-day management of the environment
  • Ngāti Mutunga capacity to engage on environmental issues and participate in activities such as environmental monitoring is enhanced
3
Social, Economic, Health, and Well-being
  • All plans, policies, strategies, regulations, laws and other methods of environmental regulation or planning identify and avoid negative effects on the health and wellbeing of the Ngāti Mutunga community
  • Establish a sense of belonging and kaitiakitanga amongst the whole community
  • The kaitiakitanga tradition of Ngāti Mutunga is continued through the generations
Te Puna Waiora
The traditions of Ngāti Mutunga describe the cultural, historical, and spiritual association of Ngāti Mutunga and the waterways in our rohe. For Ngāti Mutunga, these areas represent the links between our tūpuna and, present and future generations. This history and relationship reinforce tribal identity, connections between generations, and confirms the importance of freshwater to Ngāti Mutunga.
The Onaero, Urenui, Waitara, and Mimitangiatua awa are specifically described in the Ngāti Mutunga Iwi Environmental Management Plan, including reference to the resources provided, taonga, pā, kāinga, taupā (cultivations), and kōiwi along riverbanks. The role of rivers as transport waterways is noted.
River and stream objectives include restoring the physical and spiritual health of the rivers and re-establishing the relationship between the people and the rivers. River restoration is a priority as is access to these waterways. The significance of wetlands / swamps, riparian zones, and riverbeds is noted.
Our Ancestral Use of the Mimitangiatua
Ngāti Mutunga used all parts of the Mimitangiatua catchment, as this was a key corridor from the coastal plain into the hinterland, with tracks along and across catchments, all the way to the Waitara and Whanganui awa. The rivers and streams were our highways and roads, providing travel up and down waterways both for collecting kai and engaging with whānau. Mana whenua practised mahinga kai throughout, using the deep and wide waters and tauranga waka of the Mimitangiatua awa and its floodplains, and using the unique and varied resources and sustenance offered by its contributing catchments.
Cultural Values of Water
Water is descended from Papatūānuku and Ranginui; it is the lifeblood of the people because it sustains the growth of plants, animals, and people. Our children play and bathe in the rivers in our rohe, and many sites of significance are located along waterways. Water has spiritual qualities of mauri and wairua. These qualities are related to the physical wellbeing of the water and are damaged by overexploitation, pollution, or misuse of water.
Water is often seen as a commodity, but we see water as a taonga to be valued and respected. It is part of our whakapapa and our health – if the water is sick then so are we.
Our tūpuna had considerable knowledge of the ways in which to use the resources associated with water, and tikanga for the proper and sustainable use of these resources. We did not pollute our waters. It is our responsibility, as kaitiaki, to ensure that the values and tikanga, as well as the water itself, is restored, endures, and is passed on to future generations.
The Centrality of Awa
Awa (rivers) in the rohe were and still are central to the social, spiritual, and physical lifestyle of the Ngāti Mutunga people. Many pā are located along the rivers, testament to the occupation of the area by our tūpuna. The Onaero, Urenui, and Mimitangiatua have been occupied by the tūpuna of Ngāti Mutunga since before the arrival of the Tokomaru and Tahatuna waka. The Haehanga is a sub-catchment of the Mimitangiatua, located 14.5km from this river mouth, approximately 4km from the coastal plain. Historically comprising relatively wide valley bottoms with wetlands and floodplains and upland waterways in ngāhere.
Ngāti Mutunga utilised the entire length of each awa for food gathering. The river mouths provided a plentiful supply of pipi, pūpū (cat's eye), pātiki (flounder), kahawai, and other fish. Īnanga (whitebait) were caught along the banks of the river. Tuna (eel) and piharau (lamprey eel) were found in the upper reaches of the river. Piharau were caught using whakaparu, which was a technique developed by placing rarauhe (bracken fern) in the rapids of the river in times of flood. Fresh water kōura were caught in streams across the region.
Piharau: A Taonga Species
Not widespread throughout the North Island, piharau are an important and personalised way for Ngāti Mutunga to practice manaakitanga.
Our tūpuna had considerable knowledge of whakapapa, traditional trails and tauranga waka, places for gathering kai and other taonga, ways in which to use the resources of the awa, the relationship of people with the river and their dependence on it, and tikanga for the proper and sustainable utilisation of resources. All these values remain essential to the people of Ngāti Mutunga today.
There are specific areas of each awa that Ngāti Mutunga people would bathe in when they were sick. The awa were also used for baptising babies.
Each river in our rohe has its own mana and has significant historical and spiritual importance to our people.
Contamination & Degradation
Physical and spiritual contamination of water has many causes, including bad land use (particularly dairy farming), poor land management, stock in waterways, erosion, human wastewater, road runoff, agricultural runoff, historical pollution (e.g., old dump sites), and other contaminants flowing into waterways. Physical degradation of riparian areas, draining of wetlands, removal of vegetation, and changing the course of waterways has also significantly impacted on awa. In practice, this has eroded the ability of Ngāti Mutunga to undertake their customary practices and protocols, such as mahinga kai.
Te Puna Waiora Objectives
To:
Understanding
Help ourselves and others understand the significance and value of the water within our rohe
Protection
Ensure that any use of water maintains the cultural and ecological values associated with water
Health
Ensure waterways are healthy and support Ngāti Mutunga customary activities
Ngā Take – Issues
Lack of Crown recognition of iwi ownership of rivers
Leading to an inability of iwi to develop, use and protect water resources
Lack of Ngāti Mutunga participation in freshwater management
Lack of recognition of the special significance of particular waterways to Ngāti Mutunga
Lack of protection of the mauri and wairua of waterways
Lack of monitoring of and information on the health of waterways in our rohe
Lack of restoration of the health and productivity of waterways
Lack of knowledge about whether current and future uses of water are sustainable
Lack of protection of wāhi tapu and wāhi taonga associated with waterways
Rivers and Streams: Our Objectives
Our people have seen great changes in our rivers over the years. Our tūpuna were sustained by the rivers; they provided many resources, especially food. They were also key transport routes.
The changes to these rivers have degraded their mauri and wairua, and we now find that they cannot sustain us. In addition, many of the traditional practices associated with our rivers are no longer able to be practiced. Many of our kai species have disappeared, and the physical appearance of the rivers has changed beyond recognition.
Therefore, the objectives from our Iwi Environmental Plan are to:
  • restore the physical and spiritual health of the rivers
  • re-establish the relationship between the people and the rivers
  • educate others in the community about the importance of the rivers in our rohe including their history, the meaning of their names and our relationship with them
This 'Mauri Compass Project', is another example of how we are working towards these objectives.
Tiki Ngārangi demonstrating that the rangatahi of today will be the rangatira of tomorrow.
The Mimitangiatua Awa
Mimitangiatua: Names and Significance
The full name of the Mimi River is Mimitangiatua. The river is also known as Te Wai o Mihirau. Mihirau was an ancestress of the Te Kekerewai hapū and was a prominent woman of her time. The name Te Wai o Mihirau is referred to in a Ngāti Mutunga pepeha:
Mai Te Wai o Mihirau (Mimi River) ki Te Wai o Kuranui (Urenui), koia tera ko te whakararunganui taniwha
There are many pā and kāinga located along the banks of the Mimi River. These include Mimi-Papahutiwai, Omihi, Arapawanui, Pukekohe, Toki-kinikini, and Tupari. There were also a number of taupā (cultivations) along the banks of the river.
Arapawanui was the pā of Mutunga's famous grandsons Tukutahi and Rehetaia. They were both celebrated warriors, especially Rehetaia, who took the stronghold of Kohangamouku belonging to our southern neighbours, Ngāti Rahiri. The Mimitangiatua River and associated hūhi (swampy valleys), ngahere (large swamps), and repo (muddy swamps) were used by Ngāti Mutunga to preserve taonga. The practice of keeping wooden taonga in swamps was a general practice of the Ngāti Mutunga people for safekeeping in times of war.
The Welfare of Water and People
To the people of Ngāti Mutunga, all the rivers and their respective valleys are of the utmost importance because of their physical, spiritual, and social significance in the past, present, and future.
Ngāti Mutunga sees the welfare of the people and the welfare of the water as interlinked.
"Without healthy water you won't have a healthy rohe. And without a healthy rohe you can't have healthy people"
– Jamie Tuuta, Chairman, Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Mutunga.
The Haehanga Awa
The Haehanga is a part of the Mimitangiatua. It is one of the large sub catchments after leaving the coastal plain on the way up the Mimitangiatua. This awa would have offered valuable resources and respite to mana whenua travelling up and down the Mimitangiatua, and whānau harvesting mahinga kai. This would have been particularly so where the Haehanga joins the Mimitangiatua, and likely quite a way upstream in the Haehanga. The confluence of the Haehanga and Mimitanguatua was a pā tuna (Sam MacDonald, pers. comm).
The Haehanga valley was particularly close to Pukekahu Pā and would have been a key mahinga kai area for those whānau. The Haehanga was also on the way downstream when travelling to the Mimitangiatua estuary, a key mahinga kai area for us. Waka would have travelled up and down the Mimitangiatua, within the estuary and coastal plain, and beyond, along its gently meandering lowland path to the many pā and tauranga waka situated up to the Uruti valley.
Haehanga: Historical Context
Figure 3: Recorded tracks in the vicinity of the Haehanga. From Pukeariki Heritage Collection ARC 2005 – 103 Department of Lands and Survey
Pukekahu Pā Proximity
Figure 4: Pukekahu Pā location and tracks.
Historical Habitat Richness
The Haehanga historically had extensive wetlands and a network of healthy smaller waterways and floodplains that would have offered a wide range of resources for mana whenua. Wetlands and floodplains offer a wide variety of resources for tangata whenua, from fruiting riparian tree species to materials associated with flax and raupo, to kōura that inhabit and thrive in smaller upland streams and an abundance of birdlife.

In my opinion, having viewed historic aerial imagery the Haehanga Stream would once have provided habitat (in the form of connected wetlands, floodplain, and forested headwaters) for giant kōkopu, banded kōkopu, īnanga, smelt (in the lower reaches), redfin, common and Cran's bullies and abundant tuna (of both species), with kōura and kākahi also likely abundant.
Evidence in chief to Environment Court of Kathryn McArthur, dated 14 April 2022.
While there are no records of pā and kāinga along the banks of the Haehanga, its strategic location and abundance of resources would have made this catchment valuable to mana whenua.
Historic Travel Routes
Figure 5: Historic tracks and travel routes along the Uruti and Mimitangiatua awa.
Mahi Tamariki and Te Aroha – Urenui Pa c1920
Kia ū koe ki tō marae, mā tō marae ka kiia koe he tangata
Hold fast to your marae, for it is your marae that makes you a whole person.
Degradation Over Time
This collage shows the degradation of values over time in the Haehanga catchment.
Figure 6: Haehanga aerial photo collage (1943, 1982, present day).
Transformation of the Haehanga
In 1943 the catchment was still largely natural, with meandering waterways including associated wetlands and floodplains. However, some areas of ngahere had already been changed into pasture for livestock. While the extent of pasture had increased by 1982, the majority of waterways remained within their natural alignments, with associated natural wetlands and floodplains. Large scale changes have taken place since Remediation NZ and its predecessor started operating in this river valley. The extent of pasture has increased, valley-bottom wetlands have almost entirely been lost, waterways are mostly disconnected from floodplains, and watercourses have in many places been straightened and realigned with a consequent loss of stream length (extent) and habitats (both quality and quantity of habitat). The hydrology of the valley has been altered significantly. The taiao has been severely impacted.
Remediation New Zealand
Here is a map of the Remediation NZ site at Uruti.
Figure 7: Remediation NZ Uruti Site Map.
Mauri Compass Whakataukī
The founding principles of the Mauri Compass are based on this whakataukī:
Protect and strengthen the realms of the land
Protect and strengthen the realms of the sea
And only then will they protect and strengthen the people
Development of the Mauri Compass
The Mauri Compass was designed to assess the mauri of any waterway and was refined over a significant period of time with the input of Tairāwhiti mātauranga Māori and science experts including;
  • Wastewater Technical Advisory Group
  • Te Runanga o Tūranganui a Kiwa
  • Staff at the Gisborne District Council
Dedication
Potatutatu Bill Ruru (1941-2016)
The Mauri Compass dashboard is designed around the 12 indicators [attributes] that inform the mauri of a particular waterbody. It is also designed to visualise the complex interrelationships in a straightforward manner.
The Twelve Mauri Compass Indicators
Each of the twelve indicators are outlined next.
Te Ao Māori [People]
Tangata Whenua
How strong is the overall connection to the waterbody?
Tikanga
How prevalent are the cultural practices with the waterbody?
Wairua
How strong are the spiritual connections with the waterbody?
Mahinga kai
Is mahinga kai practiced?
Te Ao Taiao [Land]
Habitat
How natural is the habitat in and adjacent to the waterbody?
Biodiversity
How diverse is the plant and animal life associated with the waterbody?
Biohazards
How germ-free is the waterbody?
Chem-hazards
How free of chemical pollution is the water body?
Nga Tini A Tangaroa [Water]
Taonga species richness
How many different taonga species are present?
Taonga/Sentinel kai species abundance
How abundant are the taonga species?
Taonga/Sentinel kai species Health
How healthy is the kai in the waterbody?
Catchment Health
What is the ecosystem state upstream and downstream of the waterbody?
Mauri Compass Training & Implementation
In our 2020 Mauri Compass Report for the Urenui and Mimitangatua rivers, we were also trained up as accredited Mauri Compass assessors so that we can continue to monitor our mauri restoration projects.
Figure 8: Mauri Compass 'ringa raupā' from the 2020 assessment.
Figure 9: Marlene Benson & Barry Matuku demonstrating eDNA-testing at Uruti School.
Collaboration with Taranaki Regional Council
Taranaki Regional Council staff enthusiastically attended the Mauri Compass training that we hosted in 2021. It was an excellent opportunity to bring together western science and Ngāti Mutunga mātauranga.
Figure 10: Taranaki Regional Council Mauri Compass training.
Applying the Mauri Compass as an Assessment Tool
Assessment Context
Ngāti Mutunga has been doing freshwater surveying for approximately four years now and we have trialled a couple of different cultural monitoring tools.
For us, the Mauri Compass had a good balance of mātauranga Māori and science data collection. This will make it easier to be recognised by Taranaki Regional Council and the New Plymouth District Council while still putting Ngāti Mutunga cultural values and concerns first.
Using tuna as a major taonga species built on the knowledge that Ngāti Mutunga whānau have about the customary uses, gathering and protection of a taonga species for Ngāti Mutunga and one which a lot of Ngāti Mutunga had a connection with and knowledge of. The survey also values and recognises the skills and knowledge that Ngāti Mutunga whānau have – Ngā taonga tuku iho.
The Mauri Compass method involved Ngāti Mutunga whānau aged from 2 to 70 plus and it will be easy to involve the whole Ngāti Mutunga whānau during any future surveying we do. This will increase everyone's skills in the collection of scientific data while recognising and affirming the cultural knowledge and expertise and experience of Ngāti Mutunga whānau participating in this work. It also helps to reconnect us and/or strengthen our relationships as tangata whenua to our whenua, our awa and ngā mātua tupuna. We believe this to be important in enhancing and maintaining the mauri of the environment and the health and wellbeing of our people.
Assessment Purpose & Mātauranga Māori
Assessment Purpose
The purpose was to use the Mauri Compass tool to assess the mauri of the Mimitangiatua and Haehanga rivers utilising mātauranga Māori and the practice of mahinga kai at eight key sites, four on the Mimitangiatua and four on the Haehanga.
Mātauranga Māori
Through wānanga, we began by answering a set of questions and calculating scores based on our knowledge of our tupuna awa. We calculated scores for the historic or pre-European state and for the current state for the Mimitangiatua and Haehanga. Each set of questions feed into the twelve indicators that form the Mauri Compass (Table 1).
Mahinga Kai Survey Methodology
Wolfgang Kanz and Ian Ruru joined us for an initial site visit with RNZ representatives on December 9th, 2021. The method, data, equipment, and skills required were discussed in depth and a survey plan was confirmed. We also identified four Mauri Compass testing sites for the Haehanga catchment.
Figure 11: Haehanga catchment Mauri Compass testing site map.
Site Selection Rationale
The four Haehanga sites were selected to enable a holistic assessment of the catchment. In this regard, we selected:
1
Lower Catchment
The bottom end of the Haehanga Catchment, close to the Mimitangiatua
2
Upper Catchment
Near the top of the catchment, as permitted by water depth at that time of year
3
Adjacent to RNZ
Adjacent to the Remediation NZ operation, in close proximity to ponds
4
Downstream of RNZ
At the downstream end of the bulk of the Remediation NZ operation
Figure 12: Haehanga catchment testing site images.
Data Processing & Analysis
The raw scores from our wānanga were entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet with algorithms and used to generate bar charts and dashboards.
Figure 13: Mimitangiatua calculations.
The bar charts and dashboards provided excellent visual reminders of the mahi that we have to do to restore the mauri of our tupuna awa. We also cross-referenced and ground-truthed our scores with local reference material.
Figure 9: Uruti School
A drone video was produced in 2020 to highlight our rohe and mahi, our 'ringa raupā' in action and on location. We had a very enjoyable time.