Rocky Shore Monitoring in Taranaki

Comprehensive environmental monitoring of Taranaki's rocky shore ecosystems from 1994-2024, tracking biodiversity, species richness, and ecological health across six representative reef sites.

Executive Summary

30 Years of Coastal Monitoring

The Taranaki Regional Council has monitored rocky shore communities since 1994 as part of its State of the Environment programme. Six representative reef sites are surveyed twice yearly using fixed transect and random quadrat methods, tracking changes in species richness, diversity, and community composition.

Monitoring Period

1994-2024: Three decades of comprehensive ecological data collection

Survey Sites

Six reef locations spanning the Taranaki coastline from Motunui to Hāwera

Survey Frequency

Biannual surveys conducted in spring and summer seasons

Key Findings: Species Diversity Trends

Mānihi Road Reef consistently demonstrated the highest species richness and diversity, with a mean of 20.16 species per quadrat and Shannon-Wiener index of 1.05. This reflects optimal conditions including low sand supply and stable pool environments.

Waihi Reef showed the lowest diversity (11.46 species per quadrat, index 0.84), likely due to high wave energy and unstable habitat conditions.

20.16

Mānihi Reef

Highest mean species richness

11.46

Waihi Reef

Lowest mean species richness

Monitoring Locations

Six Representative Reef Sites

The monitoring programme encompasses six strategically selected sites representing different coastal conditions across Taranaki. Each site experiences unique environmental pressures including varying wave exposure, sand deposition, and habitat complexity.

01

Tūrangi Reef (Motunui)

Northernmost site, 7km east of Waitara River mouth

02

Orapa Reef (Waitara)

1.5km west of Waitara River, extensive reef platform

03

Mangati Reef (Bell Block)

North of New Plymouth, 3km from Waiwhakairoa River

04

Greenwood Road Reef (Ōkato)

West of New Plymouth, 8km from Hangatāhua River

05

Mānihi Road Reef (Rahotu)

Western-most site, 10km south of Cape Egmont

06

Waihi Reef (Hāwera)

Southernmost site, high-energy wave environment

The Taranaki Rocky Shore Environment

Rocky reefs dominate Taranaki's intertidal zone, formed primarily from volcanic lahar materials containing andesite cobbles and boulders. Selective erosion creates extensive platform reefs extending up to five kilometers offshore near Waitara.

The region experiences high-energy wave and wind conditions from the Tasman Sea. Prevailing southwesterly winds and dominant westerly waves create significant sand movement along the coast, resulting in turbid nearshore conditions.

Reef Formation

Volcanic lahar materials with andesite cobbles and boulders

Wave Climate

High-energy conditions from Tasman Sea

Cultural Significance

The reefs of Taranaki provide valuable kaimoana (seafood) for Māori communities, holding significant cultural value beyond food provision. This resource maintains tribal mana and standing, representing deep connections between iwi and the coastal environment.

Iwi Associations

Te Atiawa, Ngāti Tama, Ngāti Mutunga, Taranaki, Ngāruahine, and Ngāti Ruanui maintain traditional connections to these reef systems

Kaimoana Resources

Pāua, kina, and kuku (mussels) represent important traditional food sources

Customary Protection

Rāhui established December 2022-2026 protecting shellfish, seaweed, and other species along western Taranaki coast

Methodology

Survey Methods and Data Collection

Each site is monitored using a standardized fixed transect and random quadrat survey design. A 50-meter transect is laid parallel to shore at approximately 0.6m above chart datum. Five blocks are established along the transect, with five random 0.5m² quadrats per block, totaling 25 quadrats per site.

Percentage cover of algae and encrusting animals is estimated using grids. Mobile animals larger than 3mm are counted and identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible, including under-boulder biota where rocks can be easily overturned.

1

Transect Setup

50m parallel to shore, 0.6m above chart datum

2

Quadrat Sampling

25 random 0.5m² quadrats per site

3

Species Recording

Cover estimates and individual counts

Ecological Indices: Measuring Biodiversity

Two key ecological indices are calculated from survey data to assess community health and resilience. Species richness measures the mean number of species per quadrat, while the Shannon-Wiener diversity index accounts for both species number and relative abundance.

Species Richness

Mean number of species recorded per quadrat, indicating overall biodiversity

Shannon-Wiener Index

Diversity measure incorporating species number and evenness of distribution

Community Resilience

Higher diversity indicates greater resilience to environmental stressors

Species Composition: Key Findings 2019-2024

Encrusting algae Corallina sp. (paint) and Ralfsia sp. were the most widespread primary producers. The barnacle Chamaesipho columna and tube worms Neosabellaria kaiparaensis and Spirobranchus cariniferus dominated filter-feeding communities.

Among 51 mollusc species identified, top shells Lunella smaragda and Diloma aethiops were the most widespread mobile grazers. Twenty-four crustacean species were recorded, with porcelain crab Petrolisthes elongatus being most common.

51

Mollusc Species

Most diverse animal phylum

24

Crustacean Species

Second highest diversity

Sand Cover: A Critical Environmental Factor

Sand deposition profoundly affects intertidal communities in Taranaki. Orapa Reef showed the highest average sand cover at 23.5%, followed by Tūrangi (13%), Mangati (10.8%), and Greenwood Road (3.7%). Mānihi Reef maintained the lowest coverage at less than 1%.

1

1998 Erosion Event

Hangatāhua River headwater scarp collapse initiated major sand influx

2

2008 Second Event

Additional significant erosion increased coastal sand supply

3

Ongoing Transport

Black sand transported northeast along coast, affecting reef communities

Long-term trend analyses found highly likely increasing sand cover at Tūrangi (5.83% annual change), Orapa (3.63%), and Greenwood (11.9%), with very likely increases at Mangati (1.76%).

Sand Impact on Species Diversity

Heavy sand inundation results in dramatic short-term declines in species richness and diversity. Encrusting and non-motile organisms are particularly susceptible to smothering and burial, often resulting in death.

Motile organisms demonstrate better coping mechanisms. Gastropods aggregate on protruding rocks above sand levels, while pāua escape to deeper waters. Reefs typically recover within one to two years if sand accumulation doesn't persist.


23.5%

Average sand cover at Orapa Reef (highest)

1%

Average sand cover at Mānihi Reef (lowest)

Seagrass and Sandy Tube Worms

Certain species thrive with increased sediment availability. Seagrass Zostera capricorni was recorded only at Orapa Reef during 2019-2024, requiring optimal sediment for root mat formation. The sandy tube worm Neosabellaria kaiparaensis showed significantly higher coverage at Orapa than any other site.

Seagrass Habitat

Dense patches at Orapa Reef indicate suitable sediment conditions

Tube Worm Colonies

Large N. kaiparaensis colonies utilize sediment for tube construction

Long-Term Trends

Species Richness Trends 1994-2024

Long-term trend analyses revealed significant patterns across sites. When adjusting for sand cover, mean species richness was highly likely increasing at Orapa (0.81% annual), Mangati (0.63%), and Mānihi (0.96%). Tūrangi and Greenwood showed likely increases, while Waihi demonstrated a likely decrease.

Mānihi Reef

Highly likely increasing: one species every 5 years

Orapa Reef

Highly likely increasing: one species every 8 years

Mangati Reef

Highly likely increasing: one species every 11 years

Waihi Reef

Likely decreasing: one species every 77 years

Shannon-Wiener Diversity Trends

Diversity index trends showed highly likely increases at Orapa (0.38% annual), Mangati (0.35%), and Mānihi (0.27%). Conversely, highly likely decreases occurred at Greenwood (0.19%) and Waihi (0.23%), with a likely decrease at Tūrangi (0.17%).

0.38%

Orapa Increase

Highest diversity growth rate

0.35%

Mangati Increase

Strong positive trend

0.27%

Mānihi Increase

Consistent improvement

Despite statistical significance, rates of change were very low at three sites. The most meaningful trends were increases in species richness and diversity at Mānihi, Orapa, and Mangati Reefs, suggesting improving environmental conditions at these locations.

Wave Exposure Effects

Wave exposure dramatically influences species composition on Taranaki's rocky shores. Wave energy is generally higher in western Taranaki, decreasing northeast toward New Plymouth and southeast toward Hāwera. Reef morphology, including slope angle and seaward extent, also affects exposure levels.

Waihi Reef: High Exposure

Steep gradient and direct wave approach create most exposed conditions. Large boulders shift position between surveys. Lower species richness reflects harsh environment.

Orapa Reef: Lower Exposure

Extensive seaward reef platform dissipates wave energy. Sheltered conditions support seagrass growth, typically found in protected environments.

Habitat Complexity and Geomorphology

Habitat complexity significantly influences diversity differences between sites. At Tūrangi, Orapa, and Mangati, substrates can become cemented with sand and rubble, reducing under-boulder habitat availability.

Mānihi Reef's geomorphology comprises minimal cemented reef and diverse substrate sizes, providing heterogeneous habitat including stable pools, under-boulder spaces, and rock crevices.


Substrate Diversity

Range of rock and cobble sizes creates multiple ecological niches

Pool Habitats

Stable pools provide refuge and consistent environmental conditions

Under-Boulder Spaces

Critical habitat for chitons, crabs, and other cryptic species

Tube Worm Impact on Diversity

Large colonies of sandy tube worm Neosabellaria kaiparaensis can significantly reduce habitat diversity at Orapa Reef. When tube worm mounds build up, they decrease availability of under-boulder, above-boulder, and pool habitats.

1

Low Tube Worm Cover

High diversity: multiple habitat types available for colonization

2

Increasing Coverage

Gradual reduction in habitat complexity as mounds expand

3

High Coverage

Pronounced diversity decline: tube worm mounds dominate substrate

Recent years showed pronounced, contrasting changes in species diversity corresponding to fluctuations in tube worm cover, demonstrating their significant influence on community structure.

Anthropogenic Factors

Human Impacts and Wastewater Discharges

Natural physical factors largely drive diversity and composition at SoE sites, making subtle anthropogenic changes difficult to detect. However, noticeable impacts can be evident. Prior to 1997, dairy factory wastewater discharged near Hāwera significantly affected local intertidal communities.

Pre-1997

Nearshore outfall caused detectable adverse effects on intertidal communities

1997 Improvement

Long outfall installed, discharging 2km offshore

Post-1997

Stepwise improvement in species richness and diversity at affected sites

Orapa and Mangati sites are located near wastewater outfalls. Norovirus analysis indicates previous shoreline contact with wastewater, resulting in microbial contamination of shellfish. However, adverse impacts on species richness and diversity have not been detected through compliance monitoring.

Sediment Loads and Land Erosion

Land development since European settlement has increased erosion in some catchments, resulting in two to six times higher sediment loads in Taranaki's larger rivers compared to natural conditions. This sediment affects coastal water quality and nearshore reef communities.

Soil Conservation Gains

Riparian fencing, planting, and scrub reversion achieved 29% reduction in sediment loads by 2018

Future Challenges

Climate change may increase storm intensity and mass erosion event frequency

Regional Variation

Steep hill country generates higher sediment loads than volcanic ring plain catchments

Coastal Turbidity Gradient

A turbidity gradient exists in North Taranaki coastal waters, increasing from Cape Egmont toward Waitara/Motunui. This pattern is largely attributed to high suspended sediment loads delivered by the Waitara River.

SedNetNZ modeling demonstrates how sediment loads vary by catchment characteristics. When standardized by area, steep erosion-prone hill country catchments generate substantially higher sediment loads than volcanic ring plain catchments.

Planned soil conservation works offer potential for further sediment load reductions, though climate change projections suggest increased challenges ahead.


Recreational Impacts and Rock Turning

Humans can have localized impacts when exploring rock pools and collecting kaimoana. Intertidal communities are adversely affected when rocks and boulders are overturned but not returned to their original position.

Top Surface

Algae require light for photosynthesis, growing on upper rock surfaces

Bottom Surface

Invertebrates shelter underneath rocks to avoid predation and desiccation

Impact

Failure to return rocks causes mortality of both algae and invertebrates

While not associated with SoE monitoring sites, this issue has been observed at various Taranaki locations, typically lower in the intertidal zone where pāua and kina are gathered.

Customary Rāhui Protection

Following concerns from mana whenua and public consultation, a customary rāhui under section 186A of the Fisheries Act 1996 was established in December 2022, extended until December 2026. The rāhui spans from Herekawae Stream (New Plymouth) to Taungatarata Stream (Ōpunake).

Protected Species

Temporary closure to shellfish take (excluding rock lobster), seaweed (except beach cast), sea anemones, stingrays, and two conger eel species

Coverage Area

Greenwood Road and Mānihi Road SoE monitoring sites located within rāhui boundaries

Monitoring Value

Long-term data sets could reveal potential effects of rāhui on species richness and diversity

Climate Change

Climate Change Impacts on Rocky Shores

Climate change impacts on intertidal rocky reef habitats are likely to increase. Some impacts may exacerbate existing processes, while others will have selective effects on community composition.

Increased Erosion

More frequent intense rainfall accelerating erosion in river headwaters, introducing more sand to coast

Temperature Stress

Species resilient to heat and desiccation better suited to cope with rising ocean and atmospheric temperatures

Ocean Acidification

Increased dissolved CO₂ potentially benefiting seaweeds while hindering shell-forming molluscs

Sea Level Rise

Permanent reduction or elimination of intertidal habitat where hard structures prevent landward migration

Site Comparison: Diversity Patterns

Statistical analyses revealed significant differences in species richness and diversity across reef locations. Mānihi consistently showed higher diversity than all other sites, while Waihi demonstrated lower diversity compared to remaining locations.

1.05

Mānihi Reef

Highest Shannon-Wiener index

0.90

Mid-Range Sites

Greenwood, Mangati, Orapa, Tūrangi

0.84

Waihi Reef

Lowest Shannon-Wiener index

Paired Wilcoxon tests identified highly significant differences between most site pairs. No significant differences were found between Orapa and Mangati, or between Tūrangi and Greenwood Road, suggesting similar community structures at these paired locations.

Recent Trends: 2019-2024 Period

The most recent five-year monitoring period showed increases in both median species richness and diversity at all sites compared to previous periods. This represents a notable shift from historical patterns.

1994-1999

Baseline period establishing initial diversity levels

2004-2009

Mid-period showing variable trends across sites

2014-2019

Previous reporting period with mixed results

2019-2024

Current period showing improvements at all sites

Mānihi Reef showed the highest mean species richness (24.71 per quadrat) and diversity index (1.15) during 2019-2024. Orapa demonstrated notable increases in both richness (18.76) and diversity (1.03), while Waihi remained least diverse despite marginal improvements.

Sand-Adjusted vs. Unadjusted Trends

Comparing sand-adjusted and unadjusted trend analyses revealed that observed sand cover did not strongly influence current long-term trends at most sites. Similar results were generally observed across both datasets, with one notable exception.

At Greenwood Road, the mean number of species showed a likely increasing trend based on sand-adjusted data, but a likely decreasing trend based on unadjusted data. This suggests periodic sand inundation events are influencing long-term species richness trends at this site.

Most Sites

Sand adjustment did not change trend direction or significance

Greenwood Road

Only site where sand adjustment reversed trend direction

Recommendations

Future Monitoring and Research

Based on 30 years of monitoring data and observed trends, three key recommendations are proposed to enhance understanding of Taranaki's rocky shore ecosystems and improve management effectiveness.

01

Habitat Mapping Extension

Extend monitoring to include habitat mapping techniques gathering broad-scale information on reef topography, sand coverage, seagrass, and other key habitat-forming species

02

Trend Driver Investigation

Undertake further work investigating drivers behind observed trends in species richness and diversity, particularly at sites showing declining trends

03

Seagrass Monitoring

Survey seagrass at Orapa Reef regularly using methods recommended by Shanahan et al. (2023) to detect early changes in extent and condition

Key Species Recorded 2019-2024

During the most recent monitoring period, diverse species assemblages were recorded across all sites. Molluscs dominated with 51 species, followed by 24 crustacean species, reflecting the rich biodiversity of Taranaki's rocky shores.

Molluscs

Top shells Lunella smaragda (1,157 records) and Diloma aethiops (1,273 records) most abundant grazers

Crustaceans

Barnacle Chamaesipho columna (1,099 records) and porcelain crab Petrolisthes elongatus (808 records) widespread

Algae

Coralline paint (1,474 records) and turf (1,399 records) dominated primary producers

Tube Worms

Sandy tube worm N. kaiparaensis (1,248 records) and calcareous S. cariniferus (1,140 records) abundant filter feeders

Overall Summary: 30 Years of Insights

Rocky shore communities at six Taranaki locations have remained relatively stable over 30 years of monitoring, with short-term influences from occasional sand inundation events. Statistical evidence shows both increasing and decreasing long-term trends in species richness and diversity at all sites.

Most Meaningful Trends

Increases in species richness and diversity at Mānihi, Orapa, and Mangati Reefs represent the most ecologically significant changes

Natural Drivers Dominate

Sand cover, wave exposure, and habitat complexity remain primary factors influencing community structure

No Major Anthropogenic Impacts

No noticeable human-caused impacts detected at SoE sites, though subtle changes may be masked by natural variability

Conclusion

Protecting Taranaki's Rocky Shore Future

Three decades of comprehensive monitoring have established a robust baseline for understanding Taranaki's rocky shore ecosystems. This long-term dataset enables effective assessment of natural processes and provides the foundation for mitigating human impacts on the coastal environment.

Ongoing monitoring and management remain critical as climate change, land use pressures, and other factors continue to influence these important habitats. The data collected through this programme guides decision-making and ensures the protection of culturally and ecologically significant reef communities.

With many factors potentially affecting these habitats, continued vigilance and adaptive management will be essential for their long-term conservation and the maintenance of ecosystem services they provide to both people and wildlife.


Robust Monitoring

30-year dataset provides strong foundation for future management decisions

Adaptive Management

Ongoing assessment enables responsive protection strategies

Cultural & Ecological Value

Protecting resources important to both iwi and regional biodiversity